Summary
A survey of fish and
habitat in Dunham Lake was conducted on May 22 and 23, and July 8, 2002. It was the fifth scientific fish survey of
the lake since 1890. Fish were sampled
with gill net, trap net, and seine. In
addition to status of the fish populations, this report discusses many features
of the ecosystem, including the physical and biological characteristics of the
lake and trends in water quality as it affects fish.
Dunham Lake is a natural, oligotrophic,
marl lake in the headwaters of the Flint River system. It is blessed with relatively good water
quality due to excellent depth (maximum 110 feet), high ground water input,
relatively small drainage area, and caring riparians. Because of great depth and low productivity, the lake continues
to have a cold, well-oxygenated layer that supports an unusual cisco population
in addition to coolwater and warmwater species. The lake also continues to support pollution-sensitive species
including two species of native clams.
Algae and rooted plants are sparse and plant control is not practiced.
Eighteen species of fish were collected
or reliably reported during the 2002 survey.
Seven additional species of fish have been reported in the past and some
may still be present. Current fish
populations are satisfactory to good considering the low productivity of the
lake. Yellow perch are an exception;
only one perch was caught, and that population has declined severely since
1976. Most sport fish grow at a rate
close to the Michigan average and reach large sizes. Bluegills grow rather slowly but still reach large size. Anglers report fishing is satisfactory and
no evidence of over harvesting was found in the fish population statistics.
A shift in the fish community of Dunham
Lake has occurred since 1976 that may not be permanent. Increases have taken place in rock bass,
smallmouth bass, and northern pike. These
may have caused the decline in yellow perch, and perhaps also in small bluegills. Rainbow trout and walleye stocked years ago
failed to reproduce and gradually disappeared.
Recommendations include: (1) Zealously protect the lake from chemicals and physical and biological alterations; (2) Continue to minimize nutrient loading to maintain high levels of dissolved oxygen in the cisco layer of the thermocline; (3) Encourage catch-and-release fishing to make fullest recreational use of the lakes low productivity; (4) Encourage yellow perch by reducing predation and harvest of perch and increasing removal of rock bass; (5) Carefully discuss the options regarding walleye and trout stocking; (6) If DLPOA proceeds with trout stocking, encourage removal of northern pike; (7) If DLPOA proceeds with either trout or walleye stocking, evaluate rate of return to anglers, survival and growth, and effects on other species within 2-5 years; (7) Otherwise, re-evaluate status of the fish populations in 10 years or if some change in fish or habitat occurs.
Summary.................................................................................................................... 1
Table of
Contents....................................................................................................... 2
Introduction................................................................................................................ 3
The Watershed
.
.. 4
Physical and Chemical
Characteristics...................................................................
4
Biological
Characteristics.......................................................................................... 5
Algae
.. 5
Zooplankton
.
. 6
Vegetation
.. 6
Invertebrates and Other
Observations
... 6
Past Fish Management Practices
.
. 7
Fish Survey Methods
......................................................................
...........
.... 8
Fish Survey Results
. 9
Fish
Species...............................................................................
..........
... 9
Fish Abundance and
Community Structure............................
..
. 9
Status of Fish Populations..................................................................
10
Bluegill
... 10
Pumpkinseed.
..
... 10
Black
crappie.
.
11
Yellow
perch.
.
..
.. 11
Largemouth bass....................
............................................
...
.. 11
Smallmouth
bass
.. 11
Rock
bass
. 12
Cisco
12
Northern pike
.......................
..........
........................
.
... 13
Walleye
.
14
Other
Species
.
..
... 14
Analysis..................................................................................................................
15
Fish
Kills
. 16
Walleye
Stocking
16
Trout
Stocking
17
Water
Quality
.. 17
Recommendations
.....................................................................................
. 17
References................................................................................................................
18
Figures
1. Map of Dunham
Lake........................................
......................
.. 19
2. Growth of bluegill and largemouth
bass.........................................
20
3. Growth of rock bass and northern pike
.....................................
..21
Tables
1. Species present, relative abundance, and
size range..............................
22
2. Length-frequency of all fish taken in survey
...........................
...
..
23
3. Growth rates of fish
.
. 24
4. Trends in fish
community.........
......................................
.
.. 25
Appendices
1-3. Catches in gill
nets, trap nets and seine.............................................
... 26
Encyclopedia..........................................................................................................
. 29
Introduction
Dunham Lake is an exceptionally fine natural lake in a unique setting. The lake is located on the border of Livingston County (Hartland Township) and Oakland County (Highland Township), in T3N R6-7E Sections 13, 24, 18, and19. The setting is unique for southern Michigan because only a few houses are visible from the center of the lake, rolling hills and woods form the scenic backdrop, and motors are prohibited. The lake is beautiful and tranquil. In the 1950s, a 600-acre bird sanctuary was converted to real estate development with a 100-200 foot green belt around most of the shoreline (George 1984). This exceptional foresight is attributed to the planning of Murray Van Wagoner, a civil engineer and former Michigan governor. This parcel is collectively owned and managed by the 350 residential units of the Dunham Lake Property Owners Association (DLPOA). The north shore, developed later, is not in DLPOA, and has somewhat less restrictive regulations on green belt and house visibility. Lake access is restricted to residents and guests of approximately 400 fine homes.
Alterations to the waters edge also have been very minimal. Three small parks with swimming beaches have been established, but there are no artificial frontages with bulkheads or rock riprap.
Anglers report that fishing activity is light, most game fish are released, relatively few fish are harvested, and fishing quality is average. Fish have not been stocked in recent years.
In May 2002, a survey of
the lakes fish and aquatic habitat was authorized and contracted by the DLPOA
Board. The primary contact person was
Rob Schmitt of the Fish and Water Committee.
Julie Magill was also especially helpful. Fish sampling fieldwork was conducted May 22 and 23. An additional visit to the lake was made on
July 8 to obtain supplemental limnological data.
Several fish-related concerns expressed by residents were addressed by the fish survey and will be discussed in this report. A controversial question was should a walleye stocking program be re-initiated. (See Table 1 for scientific names of fishes and the Encyclopedia Section and for discussion of terminology). Of concern was the apparent decline in yellow perch and the sparseness of small fish. Also of interest was if the lake still supported a unique cisco population (also called lake herring). But more generally, the charge was to update the status of all fish populations, as the last fish survey had been conducted in 1987, 14 years ago.
Concerns regarding fish were addressed by collecting basic data on all species of fish present and their relative abundance, and determining for the important sport fishes the population characteristics of maximum size, recruitment, growth, and longevity. Also, I examined relative abundance of zooplankton and aquatic plants because they are of special importance to fish habitat.
Status and trends in
water quality were evaluated recently by Water Quality Investigators
(2001). Consequently, I focused on sampling
fish and selected habitat characteristics most relevant to fish.
A considerable amount of background information is available for Dunham Lake about fish populations and water quality. Prior surveys of fish were conducted in 1890, 1976, 1979, and 1987. Their results enable the determination of trends through time and provide a perspective on the natural variation in this dynamic ecosystem. The 1890 survey, which was quite superficial, was conducted by a crew sent out by the Michigan Fish Commission, the precursor of the Fisheries Division of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (Michigan Fish Commission, 1890). Later surveys, by James Merna (1976, 1979, and 1987) were more thorough and were entirely supported by DLPOA. Numerous water quality surveys have been conducted also.
The Watershed
Dunham Lake rests in a
deep depression left by glaciers about 10,000 years ago. It is one of the headwaters of the
Shiawassee-Flint river drainage. The
lake has no inlet streams. Spring water
rising up within Dunham Lake feeds North Ore Creek, then Bullard Lake,
Parshallville Mill Pond, Lake Shannon, the Shiawassee River, the Flint River,
and ultimately Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron.
There is a concrete sill in the Dunham Lake outlet, but it is no barrier
to fish migration during high water.
The immediate watershed of Dunham Lake has been estimated at 2589 acres
(Water Quality Investigators 2001).
Generally, headwater lakes with and protected watersheds are less likely
to develop water quality problems than lakes in large drainage systems exposed
to more human activities.
Historically, fish and
other organisms from as far away as the Great Lakes had access to all upper
lakes in the Flint system. But within
the last century, dams at the City of Flint, Lake Shannon, and Parshallville
have blocked upriver movement.
Fortunately, easy access by some noxious speciessuch as gizzard shad
and white perchhas been blocked also.
Dunham Lake is exceptionally deep (maximum 118 feet) for its size (110 acres) (Water Quality Investigators 2001). In addition, there are two other deep basins, 85 and 65 feet deep (Figure 1). Only five other lakes in southeastern Michigan exceed 100 feet in depth, and none are so small in area. The surrounding soils are mostly sandy and well drained with relatively high amounts of limestone. Consequently, the lake receives considerable inputs of ground water and has a very stable water level. Because the ground water is high in calcium carbonate, marl (calcium carbonate) precipitates out and forms the grey mud characteristic of so-called marl lakes. This gradually causes, on a geological time scale, lake shoals to become progressively shallower and lake drop offs to become more abrupt.
Dunham Lake water is
classified as hard due to the high amount of calcium carbonate. Alkalinity ranges from 123 to 198 ppm and pH
from 8.1 to 8.8 (Water Quality Investigators 2001). Marl lakes tend to be clear and of low to moderate productivity
because some phosphorus (an essential and often limiting nutrient for algae and
aquatic plants) is bound by the marl.
This beneficially reduces the rate at which lakes become eutrophic due
to mans fertilizing effects, and also completely buffers the lake from acid
rain effects. On windy days, marl
particles are suspended and may reduce the transparency of the water.
Most limnologists would rank Dunham Lakes current level of basic productivity as relatively low, borderline oligotrophic. This ranking is based on phosphorus concentration (average about 10 ppb), chlorophyll content (range 1-5 ppb), and Secchi disk transparency (range 10-15 feet) (data from Water Quality Investigators 2001). As for most lakes, the productivity of Dunham Lake is probably limited more by the input of phosphorus rather than by the input of nitrogen. Low productivity is also indicated by the rarity of rooted aquatic plants and the relatively sparse fish population.
The overall quality of
water in Dunham Lake has been ranked as A (index > 90) based on a mixture of
nine characteristics (Water Quality Investigators 2001)
A modest level of primary (plant) production is essential to every lake for it forms the basis of the food chain. Algae and other plants are eaten by secondary producers, namely invertebrate animals that live in the water column (zooplankton), or on the surface of plants or in the substrate (benthos). Fish, on the next level of productivity, eat both benthos and zooplankton, but zooplankton is essential to the young of all species of fish. Crayfish, midges, and burrowing mayflies are important types of benthos and are favorite foods of older fish.
Algae
The term algae include simple plants without roots that are either suspended in the water column (phytoplankton) or attached to the surface of the bottom or other plants (periphyton). Technically, Chara is also an algae; this plant rests on the bottom, is long, branched, and becomes encrusted with lime. In most lakes, phytoplankton (measured by chlorophyll sampling) is the dominant form. In Dunham Lake, all three forms are sparse. Algae are the plants most likely to respond to cultural eutrophication caused by high levels of phosphorus and/or nitrogen that leach into the lake from septic systems, fertilizers applied to lawns, and feces of pampered geese and ducks. Dunham Lake is one of a few lakes in southern Michigan in which algae and rooted plants are so sparse that chemical plant control is not being practiced.
Zooplankton
Zooplankton was sampled on May 23 and again on July 8, 2002. Results indicated the secondary level of productivity in Dunham Lake is not favorable for good growth of rainbow trout and bluegill. The protocols of Galbraith and Schneider (2000) were used to take and analyze the sample. A Wisconsin-style plankton net (#20 mesh, 4.5-inch diameter opening) was raised from depths of 60 feet (May) or 90 feet (July) to the surface while the boat was held steady over the deepest basin. In the laboratory, sample contents were strained through a screen to sort out the larger Cladocera, which are the preferred food items for trout and large bluegill. A favorable sample will contain more than 150 Cladocera over 1.4 mm in length. The May strained sample from Dunham Lake contained only 70 small Cladocera, 1.0 to 1.2 mm in length, and many small copepods. The July strained sample contained only 140 small Cladocera, 1.0 to 1.4 mm in length.
The most likely explanation is that cisco, also zooplankton feeders, are abundant enough to depress the large Cladocera. A lack of large zooplankton can have side effects: phytoplankton is cropped less, phytoplankton becomes more abundant, and water transparency is reduced. This side effect may explain why Dunham water is not as transparent, on average, as other lakes of similarly low basic productivity.
Higher aquatic plants
play important roles in fish ecology, both positive and negative. Rooted plants enhance the production of
invertebrates and fish. Plants also
shelter small fish from predators such as bass and pike. This is desirable in moderation for some
small fish eventually grow into large fish.
However, excessive numbers of small fish relative to the available food
supply causes stunting, especially of bluegill, black crappie, and yellow
perch. Stunted fish grow slowly and
very few reach a size large enough to interest anglers. A balance is needed, and is usually achieved
when higher aquatic plants cover about 30% of the littoral zone.
By that standard, Dunham
Lake has too few plants and other forms of fish cover. However, sparse vegetation is much better
than over-abundant vegetation from both fisheries and aesthetic perspectives. The abundance of rooted aquatic vegetation
in Dunham Lake is limited by the narrow littoral zone (<15 feet deep, where
light can penetrate to the bottom), exposure to wave action, bottom soil type,
and low nutrient input.
No floating or emergent vegetation
was observed during the fish study.
Submergent vegetation was very sparse.
I noted one type of milfoil (Myriophyllum alterniflorum) and two
types of pondweeds (thinleaf and gramineus?). Chara, the low-growing and crusty algae mentioned earlier,
was the most common plant. Also
present, especially in deeper water at station G4 (Figure
1), was a moss. Moss occurs in only
a few relatively pristine Michigan lakes.
Notably absent were exotic and obnoxious plants such as Eurasian water
milfoil and curleyleaf pondweed. On the
negative side, also absent were marshes, which are important spawning habitat
for northern pike.
Invertebrates
Dunham Lake contains
populations of two species of good-sized native clams. They are giant floater (Pyganodon
grandis) and fat mucket (Lampsilis siliquoidea). These are species most commonly found in
clean, hard water Michigan lakes. Clams
can be a hazard to the feet of people wading in the lake, but their presence
indicates good water quality because they are sensitive to certain
pollutants. As part of their life
cycle, clams release small parasitic glochidia that attach to the gills of fish
but are relatively harmless.
No exotic zebra mussels
were observed, and care should be taken to prevent their introduction into
Dunham Lake. Fortunately, boats that
may be contaminated are rarely brought into Dunham. Clams are at great risk because zebra mussels attach to clam
shells and eventually smother them.
Zebra mussels have already decimated native clams in Lake St.
Clair. Aside from effects on clams,
zebra mussels are not likely to become very abundant and serious nuisance in
Dunham Lake because most of the lake bottom is too soft for their attachment.
Another exotic mollusk, Viviparus
georgianus, is well established at the south end of Dunham Lake. This is a large striped snail, native to the
southern United States, which is migrating northward and has recently reached
southern Michigan waters. It is not
known to be harmful but may displace native snails.
Small crayfish were
found in fish stomachs and may be common in the lake. This is a native species (Orconectes propinquus) and not
the invasive and aggressive rusty crayfish.
They are a desirable link in the food chain because they mature at a
small size do not grow too large for fish to eat.
Blue herons were observed during the survey. One map turtle was captured in a trap net.
Past Fish Management Practices
The first fish surveyors of the lake, in July 28-30, 1890, captured herring, bluegills, bullheads, suckers and perch (Michigan Fish Commission 1890). The fish were reported to be very fat but small. Surveyors recorded a maximum depth of 110 feet with temperatures of 77ΊF at the surface and 42ΊF at the bottom. They recommended stocking of lake trout, wall-eyed pike, and black bass. These recommendations probably were not carried out. Bass were surely already present, and both bass and walleye had access to Dunham Lake via the Shiawassee River. No records of stocking by the State have been found, especially for the period 1935-2000. Some private stockings have occurred. Mernas 1976 report mentions the stocking of walleye, adult northern pike, rainbow trout and brook trout within the last 3 years. The last fish stocking, of walleye, probably occurred in 1987.
Fish samples were
collected May 22 and 23, 2002 at the sites shown in Figure
1. Large fish were collected with
gill nets and trap nets set over one night; and small fish were captured with a
seine. Six experimental gill nets, a
total of 625 lineal feet of net, were set at medium and deep sites. Five of the gill nets were 100 feet long and
6 feet deep, and all nets were composed of panels with mesh of 1½, 2, 2½, 3,
and 4 inches (stretched measure). Two
trap net sets were made at in-shore sites.
Trap nets had 50-foot leads and 3-foot x 5-foot pots of 1.5-inch
stretched mesh. The seine, 20 feet long
with Ό-inch mesh, was used at six widely scattered locations with firm
substrates suitable for wading.
All fish were identified to species, counted (actually, numbers of minnows were estimated), and their total length was measured to 0.1 inch or to inch group (e.g., 3 = 3.0 to 3.9 inches; 4 = 4.0 to 4.9 inches; etc.). Scale samples were removed from representative northern pike, largemouth and smallmouth bass, bluegill, pumpkinseed, rock bass, cisco, and yellow perch. Some of the fish caught in gill nets were lively enough for release back into the lake; all fish caught by other methods were released in good condition. Some dead pike, rock bass, and cisco were examined to determine the food in their stomachs. The fillets of some rock bass and cisco were examined for the occurrence of parasites.
In the laboratory, impressions of the scales were made on plastic, projected with a microfiche reader, and then examined to determine age and growth rate. Growth rates were compared to the State of Michigan averages for each species (Schneider et al. 2000a). Weight of fish caught in nets was estimated from fish lengths and state average length-weight equations (Schneider et al. 2000b).
In analyzing these data,
the important considerations were:
·Physical, chemical, and
biological suitability of the habitat;
·Relative abundance of
each species;
·Species proportions, an
indicator of predator-prey balance;
·Presence of large fish,
which are important to anglers;
·Presence of small fish, an
indicator of recent spawning success and future fishing;
·Mortality rate, as
indicated by maximum age (longevity);
·Consistent reproductive
success, as indicated by presence of all age groups
(year
classes) expected to be caught by the gear;
·Growth, which indicates
the balance between number of fish and food supply.
Fish Survey Results
Fish Species
The family, common, and scientific names of fishes collected from Dunham Lake in the year 2002 are listed in Table 1. The list is long and diverse, indicative of the diversity and quality of habitat that the lake provides. We collected 15 species, observed two others, and another (walleye) was reliably reported as late as 2001. The lake contains a mixture of coldwater (cisco), coolwater (e.g., smallmouth and rock bass), and warmwater (e.g., largemouth bass and bluegill) species. Note that other species (such as white sucker) may be present because failure to collect fish does not prove they are absent.
Information on relative abundance and size distribution of collected fish are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Detailed records of catches in gill nets, trap nets, and seine may be found in Appendices 1-3. Note that a ranking system for relative abundance was used in Table 1 because nets are selective for certain species and sizes and not others. No type of fish sampling gear gives a completely unbiased picture of the abundance and size structure of a population and the species composition of the fish community.
The fish community in Dunham Lake is unusual among southern Michigan lakes due to the relatively high presence of cisco, smallmouth bass, and rock bass (Table 2). Among the sport species, rock bass was ranked as abundant and bluegill, largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, and northern pike were ranked as common. Combined sport fish totals were satisfactory, comprising 40% of the total numbers caught and 95% of the total weight caught (Table 2).
The catch of the top
sportfish predatorsnorthern pike and basswas higher than normal. Their combined total was 73% by weight (Table 2). As a rule of
thumb, all predators should make up 20-40% of the fish community biomass for
good predator-prey balance (Schneider 1981).
Rough fish (e.g., longnose gar, carp, bullheads, and sucker) are unusually rare in Dunham Lake and are not a potential problem. These species (white sucker excepted) prefer warmer water. The net catch was limited to one yellow bullhead (2%, Table 2). As a rule of thumb (Schneider 1981), rough fish may have a significant negative effect on sport fish when they exceed 50% of the fish community biomass.
Small forage fish were of modest overall abundance (Table 1). Small bluegill were present but were not plentiful compared to other lakes. No small yellow perch were collected, which is very unusual. Four species of minnows were found, of which two, bluntnose minnow and blacknose shiner, were abundant. Two important species usually found in area lakes, golden shiner and lake chubsucker were not captured; those species prefer greater amounts of submerged vegetation than Dunham Lake offers.
Status of Fish Populations
The bluegill is
a key species in Michigan lakes because it is often abundant and its growth is
usually a good indicator of overall fishing potential. In Dunham Lake,
bluegills are only of moderate abundance and on average are growing rather
slowly, 1.0 inch below the State of Michigan standard (Figure
2 and Table 3). However, some large bluegills are produced
and the population should be considered satisfactory. The largest one we netted was 8.8 inches long (Tables 2), but
anglers have reported bluegills close to 10 inches. A good bluegill lake (in terms of size structure, not
necessarily abundance) has been defined as one producing bluegills over 8.0
inches (Schneider 1990).
In Dunham Lake, the
bluegill population is constrained by the relatively small amount of warm-water
habitat, low basic productivity, and lack of vegetative cover. Growth of smaller bluegill, especially, was
much below the State standard. Research
elsewhere has shown that small bluegill are reluctant to move offshore and out
of weed beds because they would be more vulnerable to bass and pike predation
in open waters.
Zooplankton sampling (see above) confirmed that
bluegill food is relatively sparse even in deeper waters.
Bluegill up to age 8 were netted, which suggests the populations mortality rate is normal and that harvest by anglers is not excessive (Table 3). However, no bluegills from the youngest age group were collected. This suggests that poor spawning or survival may have occurred in 2001. Sometimes such weak year classes are due to cold summer weather, but that is not a likely explanation in this case.
Bluegills have been
caught in every survey of Dunham Lake since 1890 (Table 4). Compared to prior data, the bluegill
population in 2002 may be slightly depressed (Table 4) and much slower growing. However, these data have been quite
variable. Growth indices were -0.4 in
1976, +0.8 in 1979, +0.1 in 1987, and 1.0 in 2002.
Based on the limited
sample, common sunfish were found to be sparse but some were relatively large
(up to 8.1 inches). It appears small
pumpkinseeds grow as slowly as small bluegills, but large pumpkinseeds grow
better than large bluegills, indicating a more favorable balance between food
supply and population abundance.
Pumpkinseeds have a different ecological niche than bluegills because
they eat less zooplankton, eat more snails and other benthos, and live on the
shoals most of the time. Marl lakes
usually support large snail populations and good pumpkinseed populations.
Surprisingly,
pumpkinseeds were not taken in Dunham Lake surveys until 1987 (Table 4). However, it is likely that the species is
native to the lake because it is native to the watershed. They can be missed in surveys that use only
gill nets.
Only one perch,
8.0-inches long, was taken (Tables 1 and 2).
That strongly suggests that perch have become sparse in Dunham
Lake. Usually, gill nets and beach
seines are very effective tools for sampling adult and juvenile perch. The problem is more likely to be poor
survival than poor reproduction. Here,
as in other lakes, many small perch may become food for predators, and even
large perch are vulnerable to large predators such as pike and walleye. Perch grow well on diets of minnows and
benthic invertebrates such as mayflies, and midge larvae. In some lakes, perch eat significant numbers
of small bluegills during winter.
A very unusual
observation was this 8.0 female perch still contained ripe eggs when captured
on May 23. In most southern Michigan
lakes perch spawning is completed by mid April. However, due to great depth and the cool spring, Dunham Lake
surface water did not warm to 55oF, the temperature perch prefer for
spawning, until May 15.
Perch were present as
far back as 1890 and are likely native to Dunham Lake (Table 4). Gill net catch data indicate perch were
decidedly more abundant in the 1970s than since then.
This population has
satisfactory characteristics given the limited amount of warm-water habitat
available to them. Largemouth bass
comprised 21% of the total catch by weight.
The largest bass netted was 16.9 inches long and 7 years old (Tables
1-3). Anglers occasionally take larger
sizes and fishing is considered to be satisfactory. Bass growth rate matched the State average (Figure 2 and Table 3). Bass
and other predators have a large variety of food types available to them in
Dunham Lake and have an advantage because prey fish have relatively few places
to hide.
Historically, the numbers of largemouth bass in Dunham Lake have been approximately the same since 1976 (Table 4). (The species was likely missed by gill netting conducted in 1890.) Growth indices have varied considerably (-0.1 in 1976, +1.7 in 1979, +2.7 in 1987, and +0.1 in 2002) but that is probably normal population oscillation and sampling variation. Some improvement in bass size should have occurred after 1976 due to increases in bass minimum size limit (10 to 12 to 14 inches) and the widespread practice of catch-and-release angling, but the samples are insufficient to detect changes in population size structure.
This population probably
has satisfactory characteristics. This
a is a tentative conclusion based on a sample of one fish, 14.8 inches long and
4 years old (Tables 1-3). Growth rate
of this bass far exceeded the State average.
Smallmouth bass comprised only 2% of the total catch by weight of fish
sampled, but this may be an underestimate of their true abundance because
anglers report they catch nearly as many smallmouth as largemouth. Anglers occasionally take larger sizes and
bass fishing is considered to be satisfactory.
Crayfish, a favorite food of smallmouth, occur in the lake, and the volume
of suitable cool-water habitat should favor this species over largemouth bass.
The history of smallmouth bass in Dunham Lake is unclear. This species, like others, had access to the lake via the connecting waters prior to the construction of dams by white settlers. Yet, the presence of smallmouth bass was not reported in any of the four previous surveys (Table 4). This strongly suggests the population has increased considerably since 1987. As far as known, smallmouth bass have not been stocked and this change is natural.
This population is relatively abundant (7%of the net catch by
weight). Because the species prefers
cool waters, they find more suitable habitat in Dunham Lake than in other
southern Michigan lakes. Good-sized
rock bass were taken (up to 10.4 inches long) and their growth rate was above
the state average (Figure 3 and Table 4).
Unfortunately, these rock bass carry a burden of parasites that, while
rarely lethal to the host fish, makes them unappetizing. Two out of five fillets contained yellow
grub (Clinostomum) and three out of five contained black spot (Neascus). Both parasites have complicated life cycles
involving fish-eating birds such as herons.
These cysts should be removed while cleaning the fish, but are harmless
to man if cooked and eaten.
The stomach contents of 14 rock bass were examined to determine their
diet. Nine out of 14 contained food:
nine had crayfish, six had dragonfly naiads, and two had small bluegills. These types of food items are also
traditional favorites of smallmouth bass and yellow perch.
Rock bass have been on the increase (Table 4). None were reported in 1890 (but were
probably present) and only small catches were made in 1976 and 1979. Gill net catches increased slightly in 1987
and strongly in 2002.
Lake herring are still present in Dunham Lake, a sign that water
quality remains good. Only four ciscoes
were taken, but others could have avoided the gill nets set in deep water for
them. One angler reported seeing many
cisco surface feeding after ice-out last spring, and confirmed their identity
by catching some by hook-and-line. The
cisco taken in nets ranged from 10.6 to 11.4 inches long and from age 3 to age
4 (Table 3).
Their growth rate approximated the State average. Two out of three fillets contained yellow
grub infestations. All three cisco had been
feeding on zooplankton, as expected.
Ciscoes are surely native to Dunham Lake because some have been caught in every netting survey since 1890 (Table 4). The species was never (or rarely) stocked anywhere in Michigan. The highest catch rate (and probably abundance) occurred in 1976. The catch in 2002 has appreciably lower, but on a par with 1979. Growth indices were lower in 2002 (-0.1) than in 1976 (+0.9), 1979 (+1.8), and 1987 (+1.9). That data, plus the relatively low numbers of zooplankton present in deeper waters noted above, suggests the cisco population is still healthy.
Generally, ciscoes live
in midwater where they feed primarily on zooplankton. Consequently, they are rarely caught by anglers, but will
occasionally bite on small minnows. In
early December, they move into a depth of 10 feet where they spawn over sparse
beds of Chara. At that time they
may be observed by shining floodlights into the water.
Only 153 Michigan lakes contain
populations of cisco due to this species need for high-quality habitat (Latta
1995). As a member of the trout family,
it requires a layer of cold water in mid-summer containing a relatively high
amount of dissolved oxygen (DO).
Definitions of this cisco layer vary, but the most strict is where
temperature £63oF and
dissolved oxygen ³4 ppm (Latta 1995). Ciscoes are very vulnerable to the
degradation of the layer by eutrophication because organic decomposition
depletes the reserve of DO. This may
cause cisco die-offs in mid summer.
The table below defines the summer cisco layer in Dunham Lake from 1984 to 2002 based on temperature-DO profiles (Fusilier 2001 and this study). These show a high annual variation, but no overall trend toward degradation. In summer 1989, the cisco layer became dangerously thin (5 feet) because the lake did not completely turnover (i.e., regenerate DO by mixing with air) the previous spring (Water Quality Investigators 2001). In 2002, the cisco layer deceptively appears to be thicker (50 feet) because the profile was taken earlier in the summer.
|
|
Depth where |
Depth where |
Thickness of |
Sample date
|
Temp < 63oF |
DO >4 ppm |
cisco layer |
|
September 12, 1984 |
>34 ft |
<52 ft |
18 ft |
|
August 23, 1989 |
>25 ft |
<30 ft |
5 ft |
|
August 7, 1995 |
>22 ft |
<42 ft |
20 ft |
|
August 31, 2000 |
>27 ft |
<45 ft |
18 ft |
|
July 8, 2002 |
>22 ft |
<85 ft |
50 ft |
Pike were surprisingly abundant.
Nine pike were taken that comprised 50% of the weight of all fish
sampled (Table 2). That proportion may be
somewhat inflated because pike are more readily caught in gill nets than bass
and bluegills. The largest pike was 30.3
inches (about 6.5 pounds) and the smallest was 15.0 inches. A good mixture of age groups was
represented, from age 1 to age 6 (Table 3). This suggest that successful spawning is occurring
in most years even though Dunham Lake lacks the marshy habitat pike
prefer. Other possible explanations are
pike are making due with poor spawning habitat or are migrating into the lake
via the outlet. Interestingly, a
21.7inch female caught on May 23 still contained ripe eggs that should have
been deposited 1-2 months earlier.
Apparently, that pike was frustrated and was not going to spawn at all
in 2002.
Pike growth rate was considerably above the Michigan average (Figure 3 and Table 3). Favorable growth can be attributed to good
temperature conditions, presence of cisco, and sparse cover that makes all
species of smaller fish more vulnerable to pike predation. Large pike can eat relatively large fish of
all species, and excessive pike populations can significantly reduce fishing
for other fishes. Cisco and yellow
perch are often preferred food. We
examined the stomach contents of four dead pike from Dunham Lake: three were empty and the fourth contained
two 9-inch ciscoes.
Pike were not reported in the 1890 survey, and the species may not have
been established in Dunham Lake until after some adults were stocked in the mid
1970s (Merna 1976). Five of those
stocked adult pike were netted in 1976.
Only two pike were netted in 1987, but they were ages 4 and 6,
indicating that they been produced within the lake. The catch of nine pike in 2002 indicates the pike population
continues to expand. The cause of the
increase in pike in the last decade is unclear, but it may be aggravating the
decline in yellow perch.
No walleye were captured during this survey. However, anglers reportedly caught a few walleye as recently as 2001,
so it is likely that a few more remain in Dunham Lake. Because of their very large size (circa 30
inches) these were likely remnants from the last walleye stocking (1987?). Walleye were also stocked in 1975, and nine
of those survivors were taken in the 1976 survey when two years old and 13.6
inches long (Merna 1976). No walleyes
were taken in 1979, 1987, and 2002 surveys, suggesting that walleyes were not
able to establish a reproducing population.
Dunham Lake lacks the rocky shoals or inlet rivers that walleyes require
for successful spawning. However,
Dunham Lake provides good habitat for walleye survival and growth because of
its coolwater habitat and cisco forage base.
That is confirmed by the results 1975 and 1987 stocking. The survival of walleye from 1987 to 2001
(14 years) is remarkably good. A
typical life span is 10 years, but the Michigan record is held by one walleye
that lived 26 or more years in Lake Gogebic.
As noted above, among the larger sized rough fishes common to lakes
only the yellow bullhead was represented in 2002 netting results. Catches of both bullheads and suckers were
much higher in 1987, but there are other years when none have been caught in
sampling (Table 4).
A total of 25 species of fish have been collected from Dunham Lake
since 1890 (Table 4). Rarer species, collected sporadically, may have been present in
all years. Especially interesting is
the catch of several emerald shiners in 2002.
That species is abundant in the Great Lakes but is established in only a
couple large and cool inland lakes.
They are widely sold as fishing bait, and most likely some were dumped
into Dunham Lake by an angler. They may
reproduce in Dunham Lake and provide additional food for predators.
Dunham Lake is the most unique and beautiful lake I have seen in
southern Michigan. Because the lake has
exceptional depth, it has cold and well-oxygenated water, provides diverse fish
habitats, has low basic productivity, and lacks problems with excessive algae
and rooted plants. Its pristine
character is well protected by the green belt and caring residents.
The relative fish productivity of Dunham Lake can be roughly estimated
from the limnological and fish community data at hand (Schneider 2000). The standing crop of all fish is computed
from an equation to be approximately 36 pounds/acre, or 4000 pounds for the
entire lake. The potential yield to
anglers is computed to be approximately 3 pounds/acre/year, or 334 pounds for
the entire lake. These values are 1/3
to 1/7 of those of a typical southern Michigan lake. They quantify the
reasonable expectations for the Dunham Lake fishery.
Survey results indicate the fish populations, with the exception of
yellow perch, are satisfactory to good.
The lake produces sport fish of quality size, but in relatively low
quantity. Panfish such as bluegill and
yellow perch have low amounts of invertebrate foods available, so are unable to
develop large numbers. Consequently,
predators that would feed on panfish are also constrained. Fortunately, ciscoes are able to use the
deep midwater resources of the lake and they help support the larger predators
such as northern pike and walleye.
The fish community of Dunham Lake has become a bit top heavy with
predators in recent years. Largemouth
bass have remained constant, but coolwater speciesnorthern pike, smallmouth
bass, and rock basshave increased.
Walleye are an additional complication because they too can be effective
predators (Schneider and Lockwood 1997).
It appears that predation in Dunham Lake is excessive on yellow perch,
and to a lesser extent bluegill.
Fortunately, both species are very resilient and it is likely they
eventually improve. There is a subtle
difference in predation effects by bass and predation effects by pike. Bass predation typically focuses on small
and medium perch and bluegill and often serves to improve their growth. However, in unproductive Dunham Lake that
benefit may be negated by food competition with rock bass and cisco. Pike predation typically focuses on larger
sizes of panfish, thereby placing pike in competition with anglers. Lakes with the limnological characteristics
of Dunham Lake typically have no pike and better populations of yellow perch
(as Dunham Lake was in 1976). In lakes
with more submerged vegetation, more intensive predation is needed for panfish
control and pike or walleye can be of some assistance in those waters.
Some changes in Dunham Lake fish have occurred through the years but
they have not been extraordinary. Fish
populations in all lakes experience at least modest fluctuations. Some fluctuations are caused by fishing
(cropping of the largest sizes) or habitat alteration by man, but many are due
to factors beyond our control such as weather.
In a chain reaction, weak and strong year classes induced by weather
during spawning may cause short-term fluctuations in the composition of the
fish community, in numbers of large fish, and in quality of fishing. Fortunately, strong natural resiliency
allows species to recover and (usually) to return to their former
abundance. A recent example is the
volcanic eruption of Mount Penetubo, Philippines. It sent a cloud around the Earth in 1992 that caused a cool
summer in Michigan and poor reproduction by bluegill and other fishes in many
lakes (Schneider and Lockwood 1997).
Fish kills
Fish die-offs are a common occurrence in all lakes but are rarely
observed because of scavengers.
Sometimes mortalities occur because of a pollutant or abnormally low
dissolved oxygen in winter or summer.
As mentioned before, cisco are especially sensitive to low dissolved
oxygen in the thermocline. However,
die-offs also occur in lakes that have no apparent deficiencies and cannot be
attributed to a specific cause other than stress. Fish, like humans, have their burden of natural diseases,
parasites, and physiological breakdowns.
The natural mortality rate among even adult fish is high, about 30-50%
each and every year.
Walleye stocking
The proposal to stock walleye in Dunham Lake to enhance walleye fishing
has pros and cons. Past experience has
demonstrated that a few large, long-lived walleye can be produced. The lake has characteristics favorable to
the growth and survival of large walleye, but not to walleye reproduction. Consequently, walleye would have to be
stocked periodically to maintain a fishery.
After stocking ceases, all walleye would disappear within about 14 years
due to natural and fishing mortality, and the ecosystem would probably return
to status quo.
But there are five considerations in a stocking program, all involving
potential costs and benefits. First,
the lake already has populations and fisheries for smallmouth bass, largemouth
bass and northern pike, so walleye stocking (if too successful) would place
these (smallmouth in particular) at some risk.
Second, the lake already has relatively high numbers of predators, so
extra walleye predation might further harm populations of yellow perch and
bluegill. Third, stocked walleye
fingerlings would be heavily preyed upon by bass and pike, so relatively large
sizes and high numbers would have to be stocked to get some to survive. Fourth, walleye are notoriously difficult to
catch, so will there be sufficient interest?
Fifth, walleye are not native to Dunham Lake, so to stock them (or any
other species) is a philosophical departure from maintaining a natural
system.
A token walleye population and fishery could be established by stocking
relatively large (8-10) fingerling walleyes.
That size has a better chance of avoiding hungry bass and pike and
growing to a catchable size. A stocking
rate of approximately 2 fingerlings/acre (220 fingerlings) every third year
would be appropriate over the long term under the prevailing conditions. I predict that about 5% (11 fish) will
eventually be caught by anglers. Since
the fingerlings will cost at least $1 each, the cost per adult walleye caught will
be approximately $20. Stocking success
and impact on other fish species (especially perch and cisco) should be
evaluated in 4 years. Then, stocking
rate should be adjusted accordingly or discontinued.
Dunham Lake supported
stocked rainbow trout in the 1970s.
Several large (19-inch) trout were captured in the 1976 and 1979
surveys. The option to resume stocking
still exists because suitable temperature and DO characteristics are still
present. However, there are two
difficulties to consider. First,
northern pike are more abundant now, and they would eat significant numbers of
trout. Pike predation can be reduced by
stocking expensive larger trout, preferably over 10 inches in length, or by
reducing the numbers of northern pike, as by intensive harvesting. Second, the zooplankton in Dunham Lake is
sub optimal for rainbow trout stocking success. A more predatory trout, such as the brown trout, might survive
and grow better. In 1976, rumor had it
that a few large brown trout of unknown origin were present. Negatives to consider are browns are more
difficult for anglers to catch than rainbows, and trout are short-lived, so
would require frequent restocking. In
small quantities (1 trout/acre), brown or rainbow trout are not likely to
seriously affect other sport fish.
I encourage residents to zealously protect both the quality of the water and the natural populations of plants, fish, and invertebrates. The lake is a jewel among southern Michigan lakes. It is part of the heritage of the state and of generations to come. Dunham Lake is not simply a swimming pool, fishing pond, or scenic backdrop, it is an excellent natural ecosystem. On its own it can support good fish populations and fishing, in addition to aesthetic and recreational uses.
1. Zealously protect the lake from chemicals, and physical and biological alterations;
2. Continue to minimize nutrient loading to maintain high levels of dissolved oxygen in the cisco layer of the thermocline;
3. Generally encourage catch-and-release fishing to make fullest recreational use of the lakes low productivity;
4. Encourage yellow perch by reducing predation and harvest of perch and increasing removal of rock bass;
5. Carefully discuss the options regarding walleye and trout stocking;
6. If DLPOA proceeds with trout stocking, encourage removal of northern pike;
7. If DLPOA proceeds with either trout or walleye stocking, evaluate rate of return to anglers, survival and growth, and effects on other species within 2-5 years;
8. Otherwise, re-evaluate status of the fish populations in 10 years or if some change in fish or habitat occurs.
Galbraith, M. G. and J.
C. Schneider. 2000. Sampling zooplankton in lakes. Chapter 18, In Schneider, J. C. (ed.)
Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates. Michigan Department of Natural Resources,
Fisheries Special Report 25, Ann Arbor.
George, M.
1984. Residents fear paradise
lost. Detroit Free Press, October 18.
1984.
Latta, W. C. 1995.
Distribution and abundance of the lake herring (Coregonus artedi)
in Michigan. Michigan Department of
Natural Resources, Fisheries Research Report 2014, Ann Arbor.
Merna, J. W.
1976, 1979, and 1987. Fish
survey of Dunham Lake. Unpublished
reports for DLPOA.
Michigan Fish Commission. 1890.
Ninth Biennial Report. Lansing.
Schneider, J. C. 1981. Fish communities in
warmwater lakes. Michigan Department of
Natural Resources, Fisheries Research Report 1890, Ann Arbor.
Schneider, J. C. 1990. Classifying bluegill populations from lake survey data. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Technical Report No. 90-10, Ann Arbor.
Schneider, J. C. 2000.
Interpreting fish population and community indices. Chapter 21 In Schneider, J. C. (ed.)
Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates. Michigan Department of Natural Resources,
Fisheries Special Report 25, Ann Arbor.
Schneider, J. C., P. W.
Laarman, and H. Gowing. 2000a. Age and growth methods and state
averages. Chapter 9 In
Schneider, J. C. (ed.) Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic
updates. Michigan Department of Natural
Resources, Fisheries Special Report 25, Ann Arbor.
Schneider, J. C., P. W.
Laarman, and H. Gowing. 2000b. Length-weight relationships. Chapter 17 In Schneider, J. C. (ed.)
Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates. Michigan Department of Natural Resources,
Fisheries Special Report 25, Ann Arbor.
Schneider, J. C. and R. N. Lockwood. 1997.
Experimental management of stunted bluegill lakes. Michigan Department of Natural Resources,
Fisheries Research Report 2020, Ann Arbor.
Water Quality Investigators. 2001.
Dunham Lake 1984-2000 water quality studies.
Algae (or Phytoplankton)-- Single cell plants
that float in the water. They are the
primary food for small animals such as zooplankton and benthos. Some species of algae, especially the
blue-greens, form stringy clumps.
Obnoxious algae blooms can be temporarily controlled by treatment with
copper sulfate.
Alkalinity-- A measurement of the carbonate and
bicarbonate compounds dissolved in water.
Like the hardness test, alkalinity is a measure of mineral content and a
rough indicator of productivity. An
exception is very hard lakes where excess calcium carbonate ties up
phosphorus. In lakes with alkalinity of
approximately 125 ppm or greater, excess calcium carbonate precipitates out of
the water and accumulates on the bottom in the form of marl.
Balance (of population or community)--
To maintain good fishing in a lake there must be a proper balance between
numbers of predator fish (bass, pike, and walleye) and forage fish (bluegill,
perch, and minnows). A lake should
contain from 3 to 5 pounds of forage fish for every pound of predators.
An overabundance of
forage fish (bluegills and perch) is a common occurrence in many Michigan
lakes. The result is underfed and
slow-growing panfish too small to interest anglers. Surprisingly, this situation (stunting) does not
necessarily result in an outstanding population of fast growing pike or
bass. Most stunted bluegills and perch
are 4 to 6 inches long and are beyond the optimum size for forage fish.
An overabundance of
predators is a rare occurrence, but leads to equally unsatisfactory
fishing. In such situations pike may
seldom reach a size of 20 inches.
Bluegills and perch will usually persist in the lake, but may be so
scarce that they will seldom be caught.
They will reproduce each year and produce a crop of young fish. However, most of the young will be eaten
during their first year of life. The
few that do survive will grow fast and will quickly reach a large size. Consequently, the panfish population will
consist of a few large fish and a crop of young with very few fish in
intermediate size ranges.
The growth rate of fish
is an indicator of the predator‑prey balance in a lake without actually
knowing numbers or pounds of fish in the lake.
When fish are extremely slow growing it usually indicates populations
are out of balance or food supply is limited.
Benthos-- Invertebrate animals that live on the surface
of plants or on the substrate, or within the bottom mud. Many are immature stages of aquatic insects
that may spend up to 2 years in the water.
Other common types are crayfish, scuds, and worms.
Chara (or perch grass)-- The generic name for
a plant (multicelled algae) that grows in mats on the bottom. It is not green. It is brittle and smells musty.
It forms good habitat for fish and benthos.
Food pyramid (or food chain)-- In lakes, just
as on land, the most abundant organisms are plants, which produce the organic
materials needed by all higher forms of life.
The plants are eaten by herbivores, the herbivores by carnivores, etc. However, some material and energy is lost in
the conversion between each level. The
ratios between levels in this food pyramid are approximately 10:1. Thus in lakes, each 1000 pounds of plants
(mostly algae) will support about 100 pounds of zooplankton, insects and other
herbivores, 10 pounds of fish such as bluegill and perch, and only about 1
pound of bass or pike. This is an
oversimplification because most fish feed at multiple levels at some stage in
their life.
Forage fish-- Smaller fish that are eaten by larger
predacious fish. Often refers to minnow
species, but broadly includes small perch, bluegill, and other panfish, and
even the small sizes of predators.
Growth-- As used here, gain in length or weight of individual
fish expressed as average size at a given age.
Elsewhere, sometimes refers to an increase in the number of fish in the
population, as due to increased recruitment.
Littoral zone-- The shallow area of the lake where
light penetrates to the bottom and macrophytes can grow if other conditions
(such as soil type) are suitable. The
depth of this zone is approximately equal to the Secchi disk reading. The zone is productive and supports diverse
plant and animal species.
Longevity-- How old fish in the population become. This varies with species and with lake (for
example, some walleye live over 20 years in Lake Gogebic). Generally, few panfish reach 8 years of age
and few game fish reach age 10.
Macrophytes-- Multicelled plants with roots, stems,
and leaves. Submerged species
live under the water but tall ones such as milfoil may extend to the surface
and canopy. Emergent species,
such as bullrush, are rooted underwater but extend above the surface. Floating species, such as water lily,
have large leaves designed to float on the surface. Weeds are any of the above which hinder recreation.
Productivity (or production)-- The capacity of
water (or land) to grow plants and animals.
For aquatic plants, the most important requirements are sunlight and
nutrients, especially phosphorus and nitrogen.
For aquatic animals, the most important requirements are food and
shelter. In Michigan lakes, the weight
of fish present (standing crop of biomass) varies considerably. Unproductive trout lakes in northern
Michigan may produce as low as 10 pounds per acre, whereas enriched,
carp-filled impoundments in southern Michigan may have 1000 pounds per
acre. Typical lakes contain a total of
50-150 pound/acre of fish. See also trophic
state.
Secchi disk-- A simple black and white disk 8 inches
in diameter invented by an Italian named Secchi. The disk is lower into lakes on a rope until it just disappears
from view. It directly measures water
clarity and turbidity, and indirectly the amount of plankton in the water and
the lakes trophic state.
Stratification--Deeper lakes seasonally
develop physical and chemical layers.
Two physical-chemical factors that greatly influence the lives of fish
are temperature and adequate amounts of dissolved oxygen. Oxygen is replenished in a lake as wind and
waves mix atmospheric air with water and as living plants produce oxygen in the
presence of sunlight (photosynthesis).
Oxygen is consumed by respiration of fish and other animals, by decay
(oxidation) of dead plants and other organic materials, and by the respiration
of living plants when not exposed to sunlight.
Respiration of fish is of minor consequence in comparison to respiration
of living plants and decomposition of plant matter.
During winter, dissolved
oxygen supply may become critical because ice seals the water from the air and
the darkness caused by snow cover restricts photosynthesis. At the time of ice formation, therefore, a
lake must have sufficient oxygen stored up to satisfy the demand throughout the
winter. In shallow weedy lakes the
demand by respiration and decay of plants often exceeds the supply, and a winterkill
of fish results. In deep lakes, the
large volume of water stores enough oxygen to persist throughout the winter.
During spring (and again
during fall) most lakes are completely circulated by wind action. Oxygen becomes plentiful and temperature is
uniform at all depths. In late spring
the surface waters warm up rapidly and a thermal stratification is set up which
persists throughout the summer. Three
distinct layers of water are formed: (1) the upper layer (epilimnion)
has a uniformly warm temperature; (2) the middle later (thermocline) is
characterized by a rapid decline in temperature with increasing depth; and (3)
the bottom layer (hypolimnion) has uniformly cold water. The
stratification persists because the cold bottom water is heavier than the upper
warm water and wind action mixes only the upper layer. Since the lower layers are cut off from the
atmosphere and plants, the supply of dissolved oxygen again becomes
depleted. The degree of oxygen
depletion in the cold layers determines the suitability of a lake for
cold-water fish such as trout and cisco.
Stocking-- Most species of fish have a tremendously
high reproductive potential. Females
may spawn 5,000 to 50,000 eggs annually depending on their age, size, and
species. Studies back in the 1940s
proved there is little or no value in stocking panfish, or any species, into
lakes that already contained wild fish of the same species and had satisfactory
conditions for reproduction. This does
not mean that fish stocking is a thing of the past, but rather that we should
stock with a definite objective in mind and a reasonable assurance that we will
realize that objective. Fish may be
stocked in order to introduce a new species into a body of water or for
"put-and-take" fishing.
The introduction of a
new species should only be attempted if the lake offers a suitable environment
for the complete life cycle of the fish.
The most common limiting factors to consider are spawning requirements,
food supply, abundance of predators, and temperature and oxygen
requirements. If any of these factors
are lacking, the introduced species of fish will not persist in the lake. The original stocked fish might persist for
several years and furnish some fishing, but eventually they will
disappear. Their disappearance is
usually credited to excessive fishing, but it is far more likely the result of
a deficiency in the habitat. The effect
of a new introduction on the present fish population should also be
considered. Does the present population
have a balanced predator-prey ratio, and will the new fish hinder or improve
this ratio?
Put-and-take stocking consists of planting
fish, usually of a catchable size, with no hope of establishing a resident
population of the species planted. This
type of planting is used when a highly desirable fish (such as trout) is wanted
in a lake known to lack certain requirements for a complete life cycle of the
species. The only factors to be
considered in put-and-take stocking are the effect on the present population
and the adequacy of the return in terms of catch from the money invested.
Put-and-grow stocking consists of planting
small fish with the notion that they will be allowed time to grow before being
harvested. The objective is to take
advantage of the food production of the lake or stream and eventually harvest
more pounds of fish than were actually stocked.
Most lake associations
consider predators when planning a stocking program for their lake because they
are exciting to catch and popular with anglers. Unfortunately, several of the more desirable species have very
precise, and usually limited, spawning requirements. The combination of excessive fishing pressure and limited
spawning often result in insufficient predation to control panfish (prey)
speciesespecially since predators prefer soft‑rayed minnows rather than
spiny-finned bluegill and perch. Below
are key points about predator spawning and stocking.
Largemouth and smallmouth bass.
Spawning requirements of bass are
not as specific as most other predators.
Largemouth prefer sand and gravel but can construct nests on plant
roots. Smallmouth are more commonly
found on gravel or cobble areas of larger, deeper, clearer, and colder
lakes. When bass have suitable spawning
conditions in a lake their natural reproduction will render any stocking
program insignificant.
Tiger muskellunge. The tiger muskie is a sterile hybrid cross
between northern pike and muskellunge.
The use of these fish in lake management thus requires artificial
propagation in a fish hatchery and perpetual stocking every 2 to 4 years. Popularity of tigers has waned, and
currently few are now stocked by Michigan Department of Natural Resources fish
biologists. It is difficult to find
private hatcheries that can supply this fish at a reasonable cost.
Northern pike. Spawning requirements of northern pike are very
specific, and without suitable spawning habitat, pike simply will not reproduce
and will eventually disappear. To
successfully spawn, pike require a rather extensive area of shallow marsh with
grasses or emergent vegetation such as rushes or cattails. Usually, shallow water with dense aquatic
weeds is not sufficient.
Walleye. The walleye is perhaps the most popular game
fish in Michigan. Unfortunately, they
also are rather fussy about their spawning requirements. They prefer rocky, wind-swept shoals of
larger lakes and rivers with rocky bottom.
Do not expect walleye to reproduce adequately in small lakes in southern
Michigan. But populations maintained by
stocking occasionally produce a few young.
Some success has been achieved by building spawning reefs for
walleyes. Walleyes are expensive to
buy, and mortality is high before they reach catchable size. Consequently, the cost per fish harvested
will be high. A fishery harvest of 10%
of the number stocked would be considered good. Recent research has shown that walleye can be an effective
predator on stunted perch and bluegill and aid in restoring community balance.
Muskellunge. The muskie is a fish of large lakes because
it is a top predator. It rarely spawns
in Michigan lakes for reasons poorly understood. Stocked muskie tend to survive poorly but a few would grow to
large size in lakes with an abundant supply of suckers or carp. However, they can have negative effects on
perch and other game fish. It would be
difficult and expensive to find a source of fingerling muskie for stocking.
Recruitment-- The process of adding to the fish
population (or the fishery) by means of reproduction and growth. These fish are needed to replace older fish
that constantly die from natural causes or fishing. Low recruitment for several years in a row leads to declines in
abundance and fishing quality and, eventually, to extinction.
Stunting-- Excess number of fish of a species in
relation to food supply. Results in slow
growth and a preponderance of small- to medium-size fish. See Balance.
Trophic state-- Lakes are generally
divided into three trophic states based on their level of productivity. Oligotrohic lakes produce few plants
and fish because they are low in nutrients or have unfavorable chemical
conditions such as low pH due to acid rain.
Most have very clear water. Mesotrophic
lakes are moderately productive; most Michigan lakes are of that type. Eutrophic lakes are very productive,
often excessively so due to nutrient additions from human sources. As lakes become older (age), they tend to
accumulate nutrients and organic matter and progress towards shallowness and
higher trophic states.
Winterkill-- Death of fish during winter caused by
suffocation. See stratification.
Year class (or cohort)-- Fish born in a given
year, e.g., 1990.
Zooplankton-- Small animals, primarily Cladocera and
Copepoda, which live in the water column feeding on phytoplankton. They are very important foods for all
species of small fish and also for certain large fish such as rainbow trout,
bluegill, and cisco.